Niccolo Machiavelli and his influences on modern day leaders Essay

Niccolo Machiavelli was a creator of political theories in the 1500s. He served the Republic as a diplomatic negotiator and as a military supervisor. When Florence went back to a monarch system, the Medici family return to effect and exiled Machiavelli for his past criticisms that he made towards the family. Machiavelli therefore wrote The Prince to complement the Medici family and as a itinerary to re win their approval. A good attractor is a psyche who after leaving his/her country leaves his/her flock content, the economy st sufficient and is able to observe their integrity. Machiavellis views of war world the most import prognosis that a attraction must think of, it is okay for a drawing card to be untruthful and it is better to be frighted over love would non be successful in the twentieth century. Machiavellis ideology of a good leader would not work in todays standards since his ideas our too extreme for our times.If a leader only pays attention to war, he only sup plies safety for his muckle and neglects the other grimaces that are crucial for governing. pore on the idea of war, can ca usance tension that may draw out a war. This feeling that results affects countries immensely as it tends to leave countries in a state of devastation. Adolf Hitler is an example of a leader who caused a war. By putting Ger galore(postnominal) at war and losing the battle against the Allies, Hitler set his country back many years, causing them to rebuild their society and economy. To further show that war is not the most important factor of governing, is during George Bush Seniors stipulation as a president of the United States.Two major events occurred that touch the American heap tremendously. First, the Gulf war Bush was able to do this situation in a short period of time and the American people commended him for it. The second event was the American recession of the 1990s. This fall came new-fashioned in Bushs term as president. When Bush was up for re-election, he lost to Clinton. Although he had won the war, Bush was not re-elected because he had allowed the economy to fall. With these examples, it is evident that war is not the most vital aspect to governing. A good leader must use all content to resolving a dispute, before relying upon war. One Machiavelli idea that a leader should follow is, there are two methods to fighting, one by constabulary and the other by force.A leaders integrity shows to the people that their leader is not afraid to tell the truth. To have integrity mean that one no matter what, one stays true to their say under any circumstances. Machiavellis thought of a leader being untruthful would not work today because if a leader was nominate lying, it would be printed on the presses the next day. With the media following so close to all word a politician says, it would be demeaning for a leader to have his people find out that he is a hypocrite. So Machiavellis idea of being strong, unchangeable and positive would be slightly ideal qualities of a good leader. Maintaining a strong and positive pic of oneself is what enables one to be a good leader.To be business organizationed over loved may have worked in the past but not in the present. In a democracy being loved is what enables one to maintain their status as a leader. If a leader is more feared then loved, it creates a greater desire from the people to defy or abrogate the government. A leader that was loved by a majority of his people was Bill Clinton. He was loved because he was able to maintain a stable economy, keep peace and gave many benefits to his people. By doing so he served another term as president.Clinton did not have to strike fear into his people in order for him remain in power. Machiavellis worship of being feared over loved may be true, but it is cruel and immoral for a leader to use death as way to instil fear into his people in order to stop the people from being rebellious. If a countrys people revolt against their leader, it is a sign for the leader that his people no longer believe in his governing of their country. If one has the qualities of a good leader and leads his people considerably then one does not have to resort to fear as a way of governing.When Machiavelli wrote The Prince the political theories and qualities on which he insisted worked during his time. For relevance to the 20th century, it does not apply as many of his views are outdated. During the 1900s, we now concentre more on economy and not on war. We only use war as a means of settling disputes, not to gain land or money like they did in the past. The use of lies as a way to control ones people is unfamiliar to our times. To use fear as a way of governing and to use the tactics that Machiavelli suggested to cut back fear would not function, as his suggestions infringe onhuman rights, which are now so closely monitored. The majority of Machiavellis theories of the perfect prince would not be succe ssful for a leader of today, for his ideas are too radical.